本片故事取材于第二次世界大战中61000名盟军俘虏被迫建造泰——缅铁路的真实事件。年轻的苏格兰军官欧内斯特?戈登上尉在一次战役中被日军俘虏,黄色他和少校坎贝尔等人一起被迫成为天皇的奴隶修建泰国至缅甸的一段铁路。在战俘集中营中,黄色他们忍受着残酷的折磨,但也在生不如死的日子里结成了坚固的友谊。欧内斯特在集中营里办起了“丛林大学”将战俘们牢牢团结在一起。日军的残暴让他们忍无可忍,坎贝尔少校终于决定实施逃跑计划,但计划的失败使得曾经与他矛盾颇深的战友牺牲自己挽救了他的生命。
本片故事取材于第二次世界大战中61000名盟军俘虏被迫建造泰——缅铁路的真实事件。年轻的苏格兰军官欧内斯特?戈登上尉在一次战役中被日军俘虏,黄色他和少校坎贝尔等人一起被迫成为天皇的奴隶修建泰国至缅甸的一段铁路。在战俘集中营中,黄色他们忍受着残酷的折磨,但也在生不如死的日子里结成了坚固的友谊。欧内斯特在集中营里办起了“丛林大学”将战俘们牢牢团结在一起。日军的残暴让他们忍无可忍,坎贝尔少校终于决定实施逃跑计划,但计划的失败使得曾经与他矛盾颇深的战友牺牲自己挽救了他的生命。
回复 :北海道的小鎮東川町,來自越南的女孩小荷在這裡,開始了他的千里尋父之旅。身為攝影師的爸爸,遠離家鄉來到日本打拼直到在此長眠。而捕捉小鎮風光的相片,是爸爸留給小荷唯一的情感寄託。憑藉著對他的思念,小荷鼓起勇氣拜託父親的忘年之交阿輝,帶著她重新體會小鎮的一切,她想知道爸爸眼中的景色是什麼樣的。
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
回复 :汽车,这个普通的交通工具,在现代生活里占有愈来愈重要的作用。买车实际上成为了一种积极动态的投资,在社交的意义和精神需求上,使人与城市产生更活跃的交流,是其他个人投资方式所不能替代的。本片正是从这个立意点出发,“吝啬富商”郭立行(郭德纲 饰)、“单身剩妈包工头”严小莲(王一楠 饰)、“风流小资男”陈波(许绍洋 饰)、“网购控白领”伊容(张馨予 饰)四个人,因为不同的个人目的团购了一辆“车”,从而引发了一系列“囧”事,实际展示的是围绕车引发的价值观差异的冲突过程,细致刻画了都市生活中不同人群的众生相,涉及了如“拼车”、“摇号”、“限行”、“亚历山大”族等许多当前社会热议点,加入鲜辣的笑料,嬉笑怒骂中体现故事主人公的窘境,从侧面反映出奋斗在一线城市的年轻人的真实生活状态。