宣德三年，春暖明朝于安南战争结束。定远王沐晟征战南疆十年后带着五千铁甲兵返回京城接受皇帝封赐。 正直的海兰在街头得罪书生段暄，春暖海兰为了阻止书生段暄告御状，绑架段暄。冒充海兰进宫的侍女欣欣，被皇帝指婚给了多乐王世子朱显正，给沐家带来巨大的危机。海兰和段暄、欣欣和朱显正互生情绪，在重重变幻中演绎了两段错位情缘。 最终，善良的书生段暄因保护海兰不幸双目失明，为了不连累到海兰和定远王，段暄独自承担了一切，默默的过起隐居生活，最后海兰终寻得段暄踪迹，有情人终成眷属。
回复 :“安布罗斯扮演警探尚恩，他走出的搭档死去的伤感重新回归工作，但是却意外发现他的搭档原来是被谋杀身亡的，凶手试图将罪名陷害于他，但是尚恩极力反抗。在自己管辖的地区遭到算计的尚恩决定要揭露真凶丑恶的面目，为自己洗脱罪名。经过了12回合的搏斗，最后加上一发用以救赎的子弹，在这场激动人心的战栗片中，已经没有人能够阻挡这位寻求复仇的警探尚恩了。
回复 :这个根据真实故事改编的影片背景发生在1966年，披头士乐队在西班牙南部城市阿尔梅里亚巡演时。“闭上眼睛活着很容易”是一句歌词，来源于列侬在这次西班牙巡演时谱写的披头士乐队的一首单曲：《Straberry field forever》(草莓园永恒)，这部影片也是与他有关的影片，但是讲述的并不是他的故事，而是三位不同经历，不同出身的人想方设法去接近和探访约翰列侬的故事：一个狂热痴迷约翰列侬的奔赴披头士乐队巡演地的西班牙英语老师，一个年仅十六岁离家出走的男孩，一个怀有身孕同样也在逃避着什么的年轻女孩···他们在一起的旅途，会碰撞出什么样的火花和故事？而这部影片与约翰列侬又有着什么样的关系？2014年西班牙戈雅奖最佳影片、最佳女演员 、最佳原创剧本。
奚秀兰
回复 :Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
